The Recycler
  • Ninestar Masthead Banner Inkjet
  • https://www.ecs-uk-ltd.co.uk/partner-us?utm_source=tr-636x124-8&utm_medium=didiad
  • Static Control June 2022 Masthead Ad
  • Biuromax Web banner June 2022
  • Katun March Web Advert 2021

Court kicks out Fuji small business contracts terms

Court kicks out Fuji small business contracts terms

August 12, 2022

The Federal Court today declared that 38 contract terms used in contracts entered into by Fujifilm Business Innovation Australia or Fujifilm Leasing Australia (together, Fuji) with many thousands of small businesses are unfair, following court action by the ACCC.

The Court declared the unfair contract terms void and unenforceable. Fuji was also ordered to stop enforcing these terms in current small business contracts and to cease using these terms in eleven types of standard form contracts with small businesses for the next five years.

The orders apply to eleven types of standard form contracts Fuji entered with small businesses for printers and related software. The unfair contract terms included terms providing for automatic renewal, excessive exit fees and unilateral price increases.

“We took this court action because Fuji’s unfair contract terms allowed this large company to leverage the significant power imbalance between it and small business customers to impose unnecessary and unjustifiable terms on these businesses,” ACCC Deputy Chair Mick Keogh said.

“Fuji’s unfair contract terms were imposed on many small businesses who had signed contracts containing these terms, and Fuji took action, including litigation, to enforce these terms.”

“We continue to strongly advocate for law reform to prohibit unfair contract terms and enable the Court to impose penalties in cases where such terms are imposed and enforced against small businesses, as here, or consumers,” Keogh said.

The orders apply only to contracts entered into with small businesses, which are businesses employing fewer than 20 staff.

Since November 2016, Fuji has entered into or renewed approximately 34,000 contracts, the vast majority of which were made using the standard form contracts at issue in this case. Many of those contracts are still in force. It is not known how many of these contracts were with small businesses, although it is likely this is a substantial number of these contracts.

Under the Court orders, Fuji is obliged to contact current customers with relevant contracts and ascertain if they are small businesses and make them aware of the orders. Fuji must also publish information about these orders on its website.

Fuji was also ordered to implement a compliance programme and pay part of the ACCC’s costs.

Fuji admitted that these terms were unfair, and consented to the declarations and other orders made by the Court.

Categories : World Focus

Tags : Business Contracts Court Fujifilm Printers SMBs Terms

  • GPI September 2022 Web Ad
  • Mito Web Ad September 2022
  • IR Italiana Web ad January 2021
  • Apex Web Ad September 2022
  • Aster July 2022 Web banner
  • Ink Tank September 2022 Web banner
  • Static Control June 2022 Big & Bold Ad
  • GM Tech Web ad September 2022
  • Zhono September 2022 Web Ad
  • HYB Web banner
  • PCL Web ad January 2021
  • CTS New Ad March 2022
  • ITP Web ad January 2021
  • CET June 2022 Web ad
  • HYB Web banner
  • PCL Web ad January 2021
  • Zhono September 2022 Web Ad
  • CET June 2022 Web ad
  • CTS New Ad March 2022
  • ITP Web ad January 2021
  • CTS New Ad March 2022
  • ITP Web ad January 2021
  • HYB Web banner
  • Zhono September 2022 Web Ad
  • PCL Web ad January 2021
  • CET June 2022 Web ad

The Recycler, Wittas House, Two Rivers, Station Lane, Witney, OX28 4BH, United Kingdom | Tel: +44 (0) 1993 899800 | Fax : +44 (0) 1993 226899
©2006-2021 The Recycler - Terms & Conditions - Privacy Policy including cookie use

Web design Dorset | Websites by Mark