The Recycler
  • https://www.ecs-uk-ltd.co.uk/partner-us?utm_source=tr-636x124-8&utm_medium=didiad
  • Biuromax Web banner June 2022
  • Katun March Web Advert 2021
  • Ninestar Masthead Banner Inkjet
  • Static Control June 2022 Masthead Ad

Epson and STS propose consent judgement

Epson and STS propose consent judgement

January 20, 2020

In December 2018, Epson filed a complaint for patent infringement and damages in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Palm Beach Division against Florida-based companies STS Refill Technology, LLC, STS Group Holding, Inc., STS Designer Inks LLC and 8300 Congress LLC. The two companies have now filed a proposed consent judgement for the court’s approval to end their dispute.

In legal documents viewed by The Recycler, Epson claimed infringement of its US Patent No. 8,794,749, also known as the ‘749 patent, and describes the infringing products as “aftermarket ink cartridges for use with Epson printers.”

The ‘749 patent is part of a general exclusion order issued by the USITC prohibiting the importation into the United States of such infringing items.

Epson described the defendants in this case as “wilful infringers” and violators of the exclusion order, and says it is seeking a preliminary and permanent injunction, as well as damages “and other relief”.

On 18 April 2019 defendants STS Group Holdings, Inc., STS Designer Inks and 8300 Congress LLC (“STS Entities”) filed a response to the originally filed complaint as well as STS Refill Technology, LLC (“STS”) filing a counterclaim against Seiko Epson Corporation, Epson America, Inc. and Epson Portland Inc.

However, most recently on 10 January, Epson and STS filed a proposed consent judgment and permanent injunction, which said: “The parties having considered the facts and applicable law and having agreed to the entry of this Stipulated Final Consent Judgment and Permanent Injunction (“Consent Judgment”), and the parties having stipulated that there is no just reason for delaying entry of final judgment in this action, (…)”.

The consent judgement stipulates that although the defendants should refrain from “sale of the Accused Products and any products that are no more than colorably different therefrom”, “defendants may sell remanufactured ink cartridges made from used genuine Epson ink cartridges having the genuine Epson circuit board where the cartridge has been refilled with ink, and other non-infringing ink cartridges.”

The parties seek to terminate this litigation through this consent judgment and is asking the court to approve its proposed agreement.

Categories : Around the Industry

Tags : Counterfeit Epson IP Judgement Lawsuit STS Refill

  • Static Control June 2022 Big & Bold Ad
  • Mito Web Ad September 2022
  • IR Italiana Web ad January 2021
  • GPI September 2022 Web Ad
  • Apex Web Ad September 2022
  • Ink Tank September 2022 Web banner
  • GM Tech Web ad September 2022
  • Aster July 2022 Web banner
  • Zhono September 2022 Web Ad
  • ITP Web ad January 2021
  • PCL Web ad January 2021
  • CTS New Ad March 2022
  • HYB Web banner
  • CET June 2022 Web ad
  • Zhono September 2022 Web Ad
  • CET June 2022 Web ad
  • ITP Web ad January 2021
  • PCL Web ad January 2021
  • HYB Web banner
  • CTS New Ad March 2022
  • CTS New Ad March 2022
  • CET June 2022 Web ad
  • ITP Web ad January 2021
  • Zhono September 2022 Web Ad
  • PCL Web ad January 2021
  • HYB Web banner

The Recycler, Wittas House, Two Rivers, Station Lane, Witney, OX28 4BH, United Kingdom | Tel: +44 (0) 1993 899800 | Fax : +44 (0) 1993 226899
©2006-2021 The Recycler - Terms & Conditions - Privacy Policy including cookie use

Web design Dorset | Websites by Mark