The Recycler
  • https://www.ecs-uk-ltd.co.uk/partner-us?utm_source=tr-636x124-8&utm_medium=didiad
  • Ninestar Web banner ESG July 2022
  • Static Control June 2022 Masthead Ad
  • Katun March Web Advert 2021
  • Biuromax Web banner June 2022

HP sues Ninestar and Apex for patent infringement

HP sues Ninestar and Apex for patent infringement

October 7, 2014

hpThe OEM has filed an IP suit in California against Apex, Ninestar China and Ninestar USA alleging infringement of three inkjet cartridge-related patents, with Apex responding.

HP filed the patent infringement suit on 6October in the United States District Court of Northern District of California accusing Ninestar Image Tech Ltd., (Ninestar China) Ninestar Technology Co., Ltd. (Ninestar USA) and Apex Microelectronics Co., Ltd. (Apex) of infringing the following HP patents: 6,089,687 (the 687 patent), 6,264,301 (the 301 patent) and 6,454,381 (the 381 patent). All three patents apply to HP’s inkjet printer cartridges.

The 687 patent relates to the method and apparatus for specifying ink volume in an ink container (cartridge), whilst the 301 patent relates to identifying parameters in a replaceable component (cartridge), and the 381 patent relates to providing ink container (cartridge) extraction characteristics to a printing system.

HP alleges that the defendants knowingly directly and through subsidiaries, agents, and or divisions, have made, used, imported and sold electrical storage devices (chips) for HP printers that use the 564, 920, 932/933, 950/951, and 970 cartridges, which infringed at least one claim of the 687, 301 and 381 patents. It further alleges that the defendants Apex, Ninestar China and Ninestar USA had actual knowledge of the 301 patent before filing their action and actual knowledge of its infringement, but acted despite the likelihood that its action would infringe a valid patent, and HP is seeking treble damages on count.

The OEM is seeking judgment that the defendants have also infringed the 687, 301 and 381 patents, and to issue preliminary and permanent injunctions prohibiting the defendants from infringing the 687, 301 and 381 patents. HP is further seeking costs, substantial damages and specifically triple damages for infringing the 301 patent.

Apex Microelectronics responded to The Recycler’s request for comment, stating: “Apex Microelectronics has not received any official document from HP or from the court. Thus we have no comment on the information published by The Recycler.”

Categories : World Focus

Tags : Apex HP IP Ninestar

  • Apex UStation web banner
  • GM Technology July 2022 Web banner
  • GPI July 2022 Web Banner
  • Aster July 2022 Web banner
  • Mito July 2022 Web banner
  • IR Italiana Web ad January 2021
  • Static Control June 2022 Big & Bold Ad
  • CET June 2022 Web ad
  • CTS New Ad March 2022
  • ITP Web ad January 2021
  • Zhono web ad May 2022
  • HYB Web banner
  • PCL Web ad January 2021
  • PCL Web ad January 2021
  • ITP Web ad January 2021
  • CET June 2022 Web ad
  • Zhono web ad May 2022
  • CTS New Ad March 2022
  • HYB Web banner
  • CTS New Ad March 2022
  • ITP Web ad January 2021
  • HYB Web banner
  • Zhono web ad May 2022
  • CET June 2022 Web ad
  • PCL Web ad January 2021

The Recycler, Wittas House, Two Rivers, Station Lane, Witney, OX28 4BH, United Kingdom | Tel: +44 (0) 1993 899800 | Fax : +44 (0) 1993 226899
©2006-2021 The Recycler - Terms & Conditions - Privacy Policy including cookie use

Web design Dorset | Websites by Mark

The Recycler Subscribe Web ad January 2021
The Recycler Subscribe Web ad January 2021