The Recycler
  • https://www.ecs-uk-ltd.co.uk/partner-us?utm_source=tr-636x124-8&utm_medium=didiad
  • Ninestar Web banner ESG July 2022
  • Katun March Web Advert 2021
  • Static Control June 2022 Masthead Ad
  • Biuromax Web banner June 2022

Fujifilm hits legal dead-end

Fujifilm hits legal dead-end

June 25, 2018

A Manhattan state judge has elected not to dissolve an order forbidding the planned merger between Fujifilm and Xerox.

As Bloomberg reports, this decision on the part of the judge means that Fujifilm has lost “another possible option for keeping the deal alive”. It is also the latest twist “in the months-long drama for control” of Xerox, which has kindled a vicious war of words as well as a slew of legal battles between Xerox and Fujfilm as well as between Xerox and its outspoken shareholders, Darwin Deason and Carl Icahn.

In a separate lawsuit, Fujifilm has claimed that “it will suffer $1 billion in damages if it can’t cement the $6.1 billion takeover” and “continues to believe a combination between Xerox and its existing joint venture is the best solution”. Meanwhile Deason and Icahn are both mulling over higher bids.

Fujifilm first hit a serious legal blockade in April, when Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Barry Ostrager issued an injunction blocking the merger “until the lawsuits were settled.” Xerox subsequently abandoned its plans to cement the deal with Fujifilm, following its bitter battles with Deason and Icahn, while in May Fujifilm opted to appeal Ostrager’s ruling.

Fujfilm also filed another lawsuit in Manhattan Federal Court, seeking damages from the termination of the proposed merger, saying “it didn’t seek to force Xerox to follow through on the deal in light of the injunction, but expected the order would be dissolved.”

Fujifilm has revealed its fears that it will be the only party negatively impacted by the injunction as Xerox and its shareholders have now buried the hatchet; Fujifilm is fretting that, if the injunction is not lifted, it could be subject to subsequent “attack” by Xerox and its investors.

Ostrager has “told lawyers for the companies that they could seek to litigate their case on the merits to determine if the injunction should be lifted, and he would otherwise leave it in place.”

“We are confident that the court will agree that all Xerox shareholders ought to decide for themselves the operational, financial and strategic merits of the transaction,” Fujifilm said in its most recent statement on the matter.

 

 

Categories : Around the Industry

Tags : Carl Icahn Darwin Deason Fujifilm Lawsuit Merger USA Xerox

  • GPI July 2022 Web Banner
  • Static Control June 2022 Big & Bold Ad
  • Mito July 2022 Web banner
  • Aster July 2022 Web banner
  • IR Italiana Web ad January 2021
  • GM Technology July 2022 Web banner
  • Apex UStation web banner
  • PCL Web ad January 2021
  • CTS New Ad March 2022
  • ITP Web ad January 2021
  • CET June 2022 Web ad
  • Zhono web ad May 2022
  • HYB Web banner
  • ITP Web ad January 2021
  • Zhono web ad May 2022
  • PCL Web ad January 2021
  • CET June 2022 Web ad
  • HYB Web banner
  • CTS New Ad March 2022
  • CET June 2022 Web ad
  • Zhono web ad May 2022
  • PCL Web ad January 2021
  • CTS New Ad March 2022
  • ITP Web ad January 2021
  • HYB Web banner

The Recycler, Wittas House, Two Rivers, Station Lane, Witney, OX28 4BH, United Kingdom | Tel: +44 (0) 1993 899800 | Fax : +44 (0) 1993 226899
©2006-2021 The Recycler - Terms & Conditions - Privacy Policy including cookie use

Web design Dorset | Websites by Mark

The Recycler Subscribe Web ad January 2021
The Recycler Subscribe Web ad January 2021