The Recycler
  • https://www.ecs-uk-ltd.co.uk/partner-us?utm_source=tr-636x124-8&utm_medium=didiad
  • Static Control June 2022 Masthead Ad
  • Ninestar Masthead August 2022
  • Biuromax Web banner June 2022
  • Katun March Web Advert 2021

Epson: no appeal for ART LLC

Epson: no appeal for ART LLC

December 15, 2020

The long running dispute between Epson and ART LLC came to an end with the United States Supreme Court declining to hear an appeal of the sanctions imposed on the company in their long running dispute.

ART LLC’s long running battle with Epson ended when the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear his appeal that sanctions imposed on a lower court punished his business in Epson’s complaint accusing him of selling counterfeit ink cartridges through Amazon.com.

The justices denied without comment a petition filed by Artem Koshkalda, who had argued that the Ninth Circuit in 2019 improperly affirmed a lower court ruling that “punished” his business, ART LLC, for how unrelated co-defendants were behaving in trademark litigation instigated in 2016 by Seiko Epson Corp. and Epson America Inc. over the sale of allegedly counterfeit ink cartridges mainly through Amazon.com. 

The court confirmed that “Epson had presented undisputed expert evidence showing that the defendants’ unauthorized sales of Epson printer cartridges generated revenue of at least $14.4million / €11.8 million. In light of this evidence, the district court’s award of $12 million / €9.9 million in statutory damages was within the court’s discretion.” You can read the Ninth Circuit findings here.

The case goes back to 2016 when The Recycler first reported on the legal action where Epson accused Artem Koshkalda, dba ART LLC and others of trademark infringement following a raid by the OEM’s officials supported by US marshals that found “thousands of counterfeit ink cartridges.”

In 2017 Nevada Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke in 2017 recommended issuing case-ending sanctions because the defendants “repeatedly disobeyed court orders” and they “continue to withhold evidence directly related to the issues of this case.” That ruling was later adopted by the district court and affirmed by the Ninth Circuit.

Categories : Around the Industry

Tags : ART LLC Artem Koshkalda Counterfeiting Epson

  • Mito July 2022 Web banner
  • Static Control June 2022 Big & Bold Ad
  • GM Technology August 2022 Web Ad
  • Ink Tank web banner new
  • Aster July 2022 Web banner
  • IR Italiana Web ad January 2021
  • Apex UStation web banner
  • GPI Web advert August 2022
  • Zhono August 2022 Web ad
  • HYB Web banner
  • PCL Web ad January 2021
  • CET June 2022 Web ad
  • CTS New Ad March 2022
  • ITP Web ad January 2021
  • Zhono August 2022 Web ad
  • PCL Web ad January 2021
  • HYB Web banner
  • CTS New Ad March 2022
  • CET June 2022 Web ad
  • ITP Web ad January 2021
  • CET June 2022 Web ad
  • CTS New Ad March 2022
  • HYB Web banner
  • ITP Web ad January 2021
  • PCL Web ad January 2021
  • Zhono August 2022 Web ad

The Recycler, Wittas House, Two Rivers, Station Lane, Witney, OX28 4BH, United Kingdom | Tel: +44 (0) 1993 899800 | Fax : +44 (0) 1993 226899
©2006-2021 The Recycler - Terms & Conditions - Privacy Policy including cookie use

Web design Dorset | Websites by Mark